LLM Pricing
PricingLeaderboardsToolsProvidersReleasesGuides

© 2026 LLM Pricing

About
·Contact
·Privacy
·RSS
← Model list

GLM-5.3

zhipuai·zhipuai/glm-5.3·BETA·Open weights·glm series·NEW
Flagship GLM model for long-horizon coding, agents, and complex project delivery

GLM-5.3 by zhipuai is offered by 82 providers on this page. Public prices are shown for 71 of them. Its official list price is $1.40 per 1M input tokens and $4.40 per 1M output tokens. The lowest paid channel is CrofAI at $0.40 / $1.40 per 1M, about 7.0× below the list price. That channel is a third-party gateway, so confirm its availability and rate limits before depending on it. It also has 3 free ($0) channels and 7 covered by a paid subscription; free tiers usually carry rate limits, and subscription-covered access bills $0 per token only after the subscription fee.

Artificial Analysis rates it 44.8 on the Intelligence Index, with 74.8 for coding and 53.1 for agentic tasks. Against its lowest blended price of $0.65 per 1M, that is roughly 69 index points per dollar, which is the value ratio the leaderboards rank on. Median output speed is 83 tokens per second, with 2.63s to the first token. Running one task of the Artificial Analysis suite costs about $2.0056, which reflects how many tokens its reasoning consumes rather than the unit price alone.

The context window is 1,000,000 tokens at the reference host, but hosts report different limits, from 327,680 to 1,049,000, so the usable window depends on the provider you pick. It supports reasoning, tool use, and structured output. Accepted input modalities are Text and Image. The weights are open, so it can also be self-hosted or served through a gateway of your choice. Providers report the capability flags inconsistently, so verify a specific feature against the host you plan to use.

Specs & pricing

Input / output per 1M tokens
Official price·Z.AI
$1.40 / $4.40
Blended $2.15 · Cache read $0.26
Lowest paid·CrofAIGateway
$0.40 / $1.40
Blended $0.65 · 7× spread
3 more $0 channels
Context
1,000,000
Output limit
131,072
Knowledge cutoff
—
Released / updated
2026-08-14 / 2026-08-14
Capabilities
✓ Reasoning✓ Tool use✓ Structured output✓ TemperatureAttachments
⚠ Providers report capability flags inconsistently
Modalities
TextImage

Quality & performanceArtificial Analysis · Intelligence Index v4.3 · rep. tier Max

Intelligence44.8
Value69
Coding74.8
Agentic53.1
Output speed83 tok/s
TTFT2.63 s
Cost per task$2.01
Value formulaIQ 44.8 ÷ min blended $0.650 = 69
Reasoning tier → intelligence / speed (higher tier = stronger but slower)
LowIQ 34.3 · 80 tok/s
MaxIQ 44.8 · 83 tok/s

Quality is independently evaluated by Artificial Analysis. Speed/latency are model-level medians.

Available at 82 providers71 with public prices · 3 free · 7 subscription-covered

ProviderTierInputOutputCache readCache writeContextOutput limitStatus
Alibaba Token PlanGatewaySubscription$0$01,000,000131,072
NaN
glm5.3
GatewayFree——1,000,000131,072
Umans AI Coding Plan
umans-glm-5.3
GatewaySubscription$0$01,048,576 ⚠131,071
Alibaba Token Plan (China)GatewaySubscription$0$01,000,000131,072
Zhipu AI Coding PlanGatewaySubscription$0$01,000,000131,072
Volcengine Ark Coding PlanGatewaySubscription$0—1,000,000131,072
Z.AI Coding PlanGatewaySubscription$0$01,000,000131,072
SCNet Token Plan
GLM-5.3
GatewaySubscription$0—1,000,000131,072
NvidiaCloudFree——1,000,000131,072
Kenari
glm-5-3
GatewayFree——1,000,000131,072
Z.AIOfficialFirst-party$1.40$4.40$0.26$01,000,000131,072

Sorted by blended price (input×0.75 + output×0.25) asc. The official channel always shows regardless of rank. Whether a gateway's low price is actually usable can't be verified.

Reasoning control

effort = loweffort = higheffort = maxeffort = mediumeffort = noneeffort = xhighbudget_tokensToggle (on / off)effort = minimal

Interleaved thinking (reasoning between tool calls) is declared by 37 of 82 providers.

5 / 82 providers expose no reasoning control (reasoning_options: []).

Experimental modes1 items

ModeProviderInputOutputCache readCache write
priorityFireworks AI$1.75$5.50$0.33—

Your usage cost

1CrofAI$109.20
2OpenRouter$179.18
3NanoGPT$181.60
4Merge Gateway$181.60
5DevPass (LLM Gateway)$240.00
6LLM Gateway$240.00
31Z.AI · Official$363.20

10 more channels offer $0 (Alibaba Token Plan, NaN, Umans AI Coding Plan etc.); free tiers usually have rate limits and no SLA, excluded from ranking.

Switch to CrofAI to save $254.00/mo (70%)
Note: this is a gateway; verify availability and rate limits yourself.

Price historyone sample accumulated per data sync

Input listOutput listMin blended
$4.40$02026-08-142026-09-282026-08-14 · Input list $1.402026-08-28 · Input list $1.402026-08-30 · Input list $1.402026-09-27 · Input list $1.402026-09-28 · Input list $1.402026-08-14 · Output list $4.402026-08-28 · Output list $4.402026-08-30 · Output list $4.402026-09-27 · Output list $4.402026-09-28 · Output list $4.402026-08-14 · Min blended $2.152026-08-28 · Min blended $1.082026-08-30 · Min blended $0.652026-09-27 · Min blended $0.422026-09-28 · Min blended $0.65

Benchmark17 items

NameConditionsScoreMetricSource
Terminal-Benchharness: Claude Code 2.1.207 · variant: max effort · v2.188.2pass@1Source ↗
Terminal-Benchharness: Claude Code 2.1.207 · variant: max effort · v3.028.3avg@3Source ↗
DeepSWEharness: mini-swe-agent · variant: max effort; 6h timeout; 400K context · v1.166.9resolvedSource ↗
NL2Repovariant: max effort58scoreSource ↗
ProgramBenchvariant: max effort19almost solvedSource ↗
FrontierSWEvariant: max effort78.1dominance scoreSource ↗
SWE-Marathonharness: Claude Code 2.1.207 · variant: max effort; modified anti-cheat checks · v1.142.5scoreSource ↗
PostTrainBenchharness: Claude Code 2.1.207 · variant: max effort; 3 runs; modified external-API checks39.8weighted averageSource ↗
CyberGymharness: Claude Code 2.1.207 · variant: max effort84.5pass@1Source ↗
ExploitGymharness: Claude Code 2.1.207 · variant: max effort; 2h rescaled timeout · dataset: 869 tasks105tasks solvedSource ↗
ExploitGymharness: Claude Code 2.1.207 · variant: max effort; 6h rescaled timeout · dataset: 869 tasks130tasks solvedSource ↗
ExploitBenchharness: Claude Code 2.1.207 · variant: max effort; union over 3 revisions54.4average coverageSource ↗
Toolathlon-Verifiedvariant: max effort73pass@1Source ↗
AutomationBenchvariant: max effort · v1.0.648.2pass@1Source ↗
Agents' Last Examharness: Claude Code 2.1.207 · variant: max effort; CLI28.5scoreSource ↗
Humanity's Last Examvariant: max effort; with tools62.5accuracySource ↗
GDPval-AAvariant: max effort · v21769EloSource ↗

The same benchmark scores very differently across harness / dataset, so the qualifying conditions must be shown together.

Artificial Analysis evaluations6 items

GPQA Diamond91.7%
Humanity's Last Exam42.3%
SciCode59.0%
Terminal-Bench 2.183.9%
τ³-Bench Banking50.3%
AA-LCR79.7%

Individual evaluations run by Artificial Analysis, on the same reasoning tier as the intelligence score above. Each benchmark has its own task set and harness, so rows are not comparable with one another. The Intelligence Index above draws on a different, newer set of evaluations.

Related models

Apex Flash 1same series$0.15 / $0.50Apex Flash 1 Abliteratedsame series$0.15 / $0.50GLM 5.3 Uncensoredsame series$1.25 / $2.25GLM-5.3-Flashcheaper alternative$0.15 / $0.50DeepSeek V4.1 Flashcheaper alternative$0.15 / $0.60DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731cheaper alternative$0.45 / $1.34GPT-5.6 Lunacheaper alternative$0.20 / $1.20
Data partly from models.dev (MIT) · Z.AI official docs ↗