LLM Pricing
PricingLeaderboardsToolsProvidersReleasesGuides

© 2026 LLM Pricing

About
·Contact
·Privacy
·RSS
← Model list
in

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

inclusionai·inclusionai/ling-3.0-flash-fin·GA·Open weights·ling series·NEW
Finance-enhanced model for financial research, multi-step investment workflows, and long-horizon planning and execution

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin by inclusionai is offered by 5 providers on this page. Public prices are shown for 4 of them. Its reference price is $0.075 per 1M input tokens and $0.22 per 1M output tokens. The lowest paid channel is OpenRouter at $0.042 / $0.123 per 1M, about 1.8× below the reference price. That channel is a third-party gateway, so confirm its availability and rate limits before depending on it. It also has 1 free ($0) channel; free tiers usually carry rate limits, and subscription-covered access bills $0 per token only after the subscription fee.

Artificial Analysis rates it 22.6 on the Intelligence Index, with 55.6 for coding and 27.9 for agentic tasks. Against its lowest blended price of $0.062 per 1M, that is roughly 363 index points per dollar, which is the value ratio the leaderboards rank on. Median output speed is 322 tokens per second, with 1.74s to the first token.

The context window is 262,144 tokens at the reference host, but hosts report different limits, from 256,000 to 262,144, so the usable window depends on the provider you pick. It supports reasoning and tool use. The weights are open, so it can also be self-hosted or served through a gateway of your choice. Providers report the capability flags inconsistently, so verify a specific feature against the host you plan to use.

Specs & pricing

Input / output per 1M tokens
Reference price·Kilo Gateway
$0.075 / $0.22
Blended $0.11 · Cache read $0.015
Lowest paid·OpenRouterGateway
$0.042 / $0.12
Blended $0.062 · 1.8× spread
1 more $0 channels
Context
262,144
Output limit
32,768
Knowledge cutoff
—
Released / updated
2026-08-27 / 2026-09-03
Capabilities
✓ Reasoning✓ Tool useStructured output✓ TemperatureAttachments
⚠ Providers report capability flags inconsistently
Modalities
Text
License
MIT
Weights
Hugging Face

Quality & performanceArtificial Analysis · Intelligence Index v4.3

Intelligence22.6
Value363
Coding55.6
Agentic27.9
Output speed322 tok/s
TTFT1.74 s
Value formulaIQ 22.6 ÷ min blended $0.062 = 363

Quality is independently evaluated by Artificial Analysis. Speed/latency are model-level medians.

Available at 5 providers4 with public prices · 1 free

ProviderTierInputOutputCache readCache writeContextOutput limitStatus
OpenCode Zen
ling-3.0-flash-fin-free
GatewayFree$0—262,14432,768
OpenRouterGateway$0.042$0.12$0.0084—262,14432,768
Novita AIGateway$0.075$0.22$0.015—262,14432,768
Vercel AI GatewayCloud$0.075$0.22$0.015—256,000 ⚠32,000
Kilo GatewayGateway$0.075$0.22$0.015—262,14432,768

Sorted by blended price (input×0.75 + output×0.25) asc. The official channel always shows regardless of rank. Whether a gateway's low price is actually usable can't be verified.

Reasoning control

Toggle (on / off)effort = noneeffort = high

Interleaved thinking (reasoning between tool calls) is declared by 1 of 5 providers.

Your usage cost

1OpenRouter$10.53
2Novita AI$18.80
3Vercel AI Gateway$18.80
4Kilo Gateway$18.80

1 more channels offer $0 (OpenCode Zen); free tiers usually have rate limits and no SLA, excluded from ranking.

The cheapest paid channel is the only channel.

Price historyone sample accumulated per data sync

Input listOutput listMin blended
$0.22$02026-08-282026-10-032026-08-28 · Input list $02026-09-04 · Input list $0.062026-09-29 · Input list $0.0752026-10-03 · Input list $0.0752026-08-28 · Output list $02026-09-04 · Output list $0.182026-09-29 · Output list $0.222026-10-03 · Output list $0.222026-09-04 · Min blended $0.092026-09-29 · Min blended $0.092026-10-03 · Min blended $0.062

Benchmark9 items

NameConditionsScoreMetricSource
FinFIRSTharness: ReAct with web search, visit, and Python · variant: highest reasoning effort52.85scoreSource ↗
FinSearchComp Verifiedharness: ReAct with web search, visit, and Python · variant: highest reasoning effort · dataset: expert-validated internal set77.04scoreSource ↗
FinCRAFTvariant: highest reasoning effort · dataset: internal51.74scoreSource ↗
Finance Agentvariant: highest reasoning effort; 10 runs · v1.169.19strict-passSource ↗
Finance Agentvariant: highest reasoning effort; 20 runs · v259.81strict-passSource ↗
APEX-Agentsvariant: highest reasoning effort29.17scoreSource ↗
SpreadsheetBenchharness: Claude Code 2.1.173 · variant: highest reasoning effort; temperature=0.6; 120 turns; 3h timeout · v186.5scoreSource ↗
SpreadsheetBenchharness: Claude Code 2.1.173 · variant: highest reasoning effort; temperature=0.6; 300 turns; 3h timeout · v221.81scoreSource ↗
tau3-benchvariant: highest reasoning effort; banking41scoreSource ↗

The same benchmark scores very differently across harness / dataset, so the qualifying conditions must be shown together.

Related models

inLing 3.1 Flashsame series$0.075 / $0.22inLing 3.0 Flash VLsame series$0.075 / $0.22Ling 3.0 Flash VL (DeepInfra)same series$0.06 / $0.18Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3Bcheaper alternative$0 / $0Qwen3.7 Flashcheaper alternative$0.03 / $0.13Laguna XS 2.1cheaper alternative$0 / $0Hy3 previewcheaper alternative$0 / $0
Data partly from models.dev (MIT) · Kilo Gateway official docs ↗